Built for Colosseum Hackathon

Win on X.
From day zero.

Two Claude Code skills for Solana founders. Not templates. Not generic advice. Skills trained on how real breakout projects actually grew. and what you need to do first.

$ npx skills add sagapad/launch-signal Topic 1
$ npx skills add sagapad/founder-freq Topic 2

Your project just shipped.
Now what?

Most hackathon projects get buried. not because the product is bad, but because nobody knows how to tell the story. launch-signal studies five real Colosseum breakout projects, searches what Solana Twitter is talking about right now, and builds you a playbook that attaches to momentum already in motion.

  • + Core story angle and origin hook
  • + 4-week content plan, post by post
  • + X Spaces and AMAs to attend
  • + Engagement strategy and keyword monitor list
  • + 5 fully written tweets, ready to post
claude. launch-signal
/launch-signal
Searching Solana ecosystem momentum...
MEV discourse trending. Jito revenue record
Pattern matched: Pain Legitimizer (Pyth)
── ORIGIN HOOK ──────────────────────
"Every DeFi trader on Solana is getting front-run.
zkFi is the first shield that works without switching DEXs."

── POST 1 ───────────────────────────
A Solana MEV bot made more money last week
than most DeFi traders.
It didn't build anything. It just watched
your swaps and cut in line.
We built the fix. Works with the DEXs
you're already using. 🧵
── WEEK 1 PLAN ──────────────────────
Day 1: Launch thread (use Post 1 above)
Day 3: Recreate real sandwich attack w/ tx hashes
Day 5: Team story. why ex-Aztec, why now
Day 7: Groth16 explained without jargon
✓ Playbook complete

Your voice.
Not your project's.

A project account talks about the product. A founder account talks about the person. Most founders either copy their project's tone or post nothing. founder-freq identifies your archetype from five proven patterns, then builds your complete voice, content pillars, and posting rhythm around it.

  • + Primary + secondary archetype with reasoning
  • + Unique POV: the one angle to own on X
  • + Writing style guide with phrases to use and avoid
  • + Weekly posting rhythm and engagement playbook
  • + 10 fully written posts in your actual voice
claude. founder-freq
/founder-freq
Analyzing founder profile...
Archetype identified: Strategist + Contrarian
── ARCHETYPE ────────────────────────
Primary: The Strategist (65%)
Secondary: The Contrarian (35%)
── UNIQUE POV ───────────────────────
"AI agents don't fail in DeFi because the
AI is bad. They fail because on-chain state
moves faster than any agent can reason about
it. The bottleneck isn't intelligence.
It's latency."
── POST 3 (short take) ─────────────
Every "AI agent for DeFi" project that
launched in the last 6 months is using
the same architecture.
None of them have published performance data.
That's not a coincidence.
✓ Playbook complete. 10 posts generated

Which founder are you?

founder-freq identifies your primary and secondary archetype blend, then builds everything else around it.

Technical Oracle
Rare, dense posts. Each one carries weight. Grows through reputation compound interest.
Ecosystem Builder
Connective tissue. Celebrates and amplifies everyone. Grows through reciprocity loops.
Contrarian
Takes strong positions, debates publicly. Grows because controversy is distribution.
Builder-in-Public
Documents everything, ships constantly. Grows because people root for the journey.
Strategist
Predicts markets, reads trends early. Grows through track record of being right.

Three founders.
Three completely different playbooks.

Every output is built from scratch. Same skill, different person. completely different archetype, voice, and strategy.

Input. founder-freq
Founder
Rishi Anand
Building
AutoDeFi. AI agent managing Solana DeFi positions
Background
Technical · ex-Google ML · 3 yrs Solana
Focus
DeFi + AI intersection
Style
Analytical, data-driven, slightly contrarian
Followers
~800
1
Archetype Identification
Strategist + Contrarian
Primary: The Strategist (65%). Rishi's ML background gives him a genuinely rare lens on DeFi. He understands both protocol mechanism design and the behavior of AI systems being built on top of them. Most DeFi commentators know one or the other. He can see what's coming before it becomes consensus.

Secondary: The Contrarian (35%). The "AI agent for DeFi" space is full of vaporware claims. His data instincts mean he can cut through it with specificity nobody else has. When he says something is overhyped, he has receipts.
2
Unique POV to Own
"AI agents don't fail in DeFi because the AI is bad. They fail because on-chain state moves faster than any agent can reason about it. The real bottleneck isn't intelligence, it's latency. And Solana is the only chain fast enough to close that gap."
3
Writing Style Guide
Tone: Confident and specific. States conclusions before explaining them. Never hedges with "I think" or "it seems like." Brings receipts.

Phrases to use: "Here's the data:" · "The real problem isn't X, it's Y" · "Most people are thinking about this wrong because" · "We tested this. Here's what happened."

Phrases to avoid: "Exciting to share that..." · "WAGMI" · "The future of finance is..." · "Thoughts?" as a post ending.
4
Posts Written in Voice
Post 1. POV Introduction 1/10
AI agents don't fail in DeFi because the AI is bad. They fail because on-chain state moves faster than the agent can reason about it. I spent 3 years at Google building ML systems. Then 3 years building on Solana. The bottleneck isn't intelligence. It's latency. And only one chain is fast enough to close the gap. Here's what that means for where AI x DeFi actually goes: 🧵
Post 3. Short Take 3/10
Every "AI agent for DeFi" project that launched in the last 6 months is using the same architecture. None of them have published performance data. That's not a coincidence.
Post 4. Builder Moment 4/10
AutoDeFi got liquidated in testing yesterday. The agent was managing a leveraged position on Kamino. Price moved 3% in 40 seconds. The rebalance call went out. The transaction landed 2 blocks late. Liquidated. We built a new pre-emptive trigger that fires 200ms earlier. Testing again today. This is what building looks like.
Post 7. Contrarian Take 7/10
Hot take: most "AI agent" projects in crypto are just cron jobs with a ChatGPT wrapper. A real agent: observes state, forms a belief, takes an action, observes the result, updates the belief. That loop requires sub-second state reads and transaction finality. That's not possible on most chains. On Solana it is. That's the actual moat, not the model.
Input. founder-freq
Founder
Maya Patel
Building
Pocket. Solana wallet with AI transaction summaries in plain English
Background
Non-technical · ex-PM at Coinbase · 4 years
Focus
Consumer crypto, mainstream adoption
Style
Storyteller, warm, translates crypto for normal people
Followers
~300
1
Archetype Identification
Builder-in-Public + Ecosystem Builder
Primary: Builder-in-Public (60%). 4 years at Coinbase watching users fail gives her a supply of vivid, relatable stories. Her non-technical background is a strength: she can write what users actually feel in moments that technical founders would never think to describe.

Secondary: Ecosystem Builder (40%). Consumer crypto is won through community. Maya's natural warmth and product instinct make her someone people want to follow, not just a project to try.
2
Unique POV to Own
"Crypto has been 'almost mainstream' for 10 years. The problem isn't the technology. it's that every product is built for people who already understand crypto."
3
Writing Style Guide
Tone: Warm but direct. Uses real user stories, never hypothetical. The reader should feel like she gets them.

Sentence structure: Short sentences. Conversational. Occasional one-word paragraphs for emphasis. Reads like a smart friend texting, not a product manager presenting.

Jargon policy: Almost none. When she must use a crypto term, translate it immediately: "you approved a transaction (you gave the app permission to move your tokens)."
4
Posts Written in Voice
Post 1. POV Introduction 1/10
I spent 4 years at Coinbase watching people lose money to transactions they didn't understand. Not scams. Not hacks. Just normal people who clicked "approve" and had no idea what they approved. The wallet showed them a hex string. The hex string was their entire savings leaving. I'm building the thing that should have existed from the start.
Post 3. Short Take 3/10
The reason crypto is still "coming" to mainstream users: Products are built by people who already understand crypto, for people who already understand crypto. Nobody is building backwards from confusion.
Post 7. Strong Opinion 7/10
Hot take: "just read the docs" is the worst advice you can give a new crypto user. The docs assume you already know what you're doing. The person who needs docs is the person who just signed a transaction they don't understand. That moment is where we lose people. That's the product gap.
Input. founder-freq
Founder
Daniel Park
Building
Proof. on-chain attestation protocol for Solana
Background
Researcher · PhD cryptography · 2 yrs Solana
Focus
ZK cryptography, protocol infrastructure
Style
Precise, formal but not academic, prefers long-form
Followers
~200
1
Archetype Identification
Technical Oracle + Strategist
Primary: Technical Oracle (75%). PhD in cryptography plus 2 years building on Solana means each post will carry genuine density. Posts infrequently, but when he writes, it should be the definitive explanation in the room. The account that 500 serious people follow obsessively beats the account 50,000 casual followers scroll past.

Secondary: Strategist (25%). Researchers see implications before practitioners. He should publish predictions on where ZK adoption goes on Solana and build a track record of being right early.
2
Unique POV to Own
"ZK proofs on Solana are being used as a privacy tool. That's the smallest use case. The real unlock is trustless computation verification. any program proving to any other program that it ran correctly."
4
Posts Written in Voice
Post 1. Thread Opener 1/10
ZK proofs on Solana are being used for privacy. Token transfers, wallet anonymization, hidden balances. That's the least interesting thing you can do with them. The more important use case: any Solana program proving to any other program that it ran correctly, without re-running the computation. Here's why that changes everything: 🧵
Post 5. Ecosystem Read 5/10
Three things happening in parallel on Solana that most people are treating as unrelated: 1. Light Protocol compressing account state 2. Firedancer reducing validator overhead 3. MagicBlock enabling ephemeral rollups They're not unrelated. They're the same architectural direction. By 2027 the question won't be "is Solana scalable." It'll be "why did we ever think otherwise."
Install now

Two skills.
Two prizes.

Both published on SagaPad Skill Marketplace under the Colosseum Hackathon category.

sagapad.com/skills/launch-signal → sagapad.com/skills/founder-freq →
Copied to clipboard